Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

[DOWNLOAD] "So. Ill. Asphalt Co. v. Pollution Control Bd." by Supreme Court of Illinois # Book PDF Kindle ePub Free

So. Ill. Asphalt Co. v. Pollution Control Bd.

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: So. Ill. Asphalt Co. v. Pollution Control Bd.
  • Author : Supreme Court of Illinois
  • Release Date : January 24, 1975
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 73 KB

Description

In each of these consolidated cases the Appellate Court for the Fifth District, with one justice dissenting, held that the imposition of a discretionary monetary penalty by the Pollution Control Board under the authority of section 42 of the Environmental Protection Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971, ch. 111 1/2, par. 1042) is invalid. (Southern Illinois Asphalt Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency (1973), 15 Ill. App.3d 66; Airtex Products, Inc. v. Pollution Control Board (1973), 15 Ill. App.3d 238.) We granted leave to appeal, and the cases were consolidated for decision and opinion in this court. We had previously granted leave to appeal in City of Waukegan v. Environmental Protection Agency (1973), 11 Ill. App.3d 189, which had likewise held invalid the imposition of a fine by the Pollution Control Board. Thus, this common constitutional issue was under consideration in this court. In City of Waukegan v. Pollution Control Board we held that the imposition of a monetary penalty by the Pollution Control Board is constitutionally permissible (57 Ill.2d 170). This holding is dispositive of the same issues in Southern Illinois Asphalt Co. and in Airtex Products, Inc. Other issues have been raised in this court by the appellees, which they may properly do pursuant to Rule 318(a) (50 Ill.2d R. 318(a)). This fact prevents the disposition of these cases on the constitutional issue decided in City of Waukegan. However, one issue common to both cases is dispositive. Both appellees contend that the fines imposed by the Pollution Control Board were arbitrary and not authorized in light of mitigating circumstances. Because we find that the Board erred in imposing the fines, we need not decide or discuss the other issues raised by the appellees.


PDF Books "So. Ill. Asphalt Co. v. Pollution Control Bd." Online ePub Kindle